You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!
More baloney. Nehalem, per Intel, will feature a bigger jump in performance over Penryn than Core2 provided over Netburst.
Hummm. That is not really what I understood when I spoke with the chief Nehalem architect a few weeks ago, though I must admit he wasn't exactly laying it all out for me. It's largely the same three-issue core as far as I understand.
Given Core 2 Duo is a four issue core the odds are you don't understand very well.
LOL that's an understatement, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing ;-)
One other thing. Why is everybody arguing with this "Mas" lunatic? I think the debate would be more productive if we stick to reality and discuss what the absence of Bulldozer from the new roadmaps means.
It is just fun to watch this arch FUDSTER squirm as his inane and inept predictions come crumbling around him.
I suppose it is a bit like pulling the wings off a retarded fly. LOL!!!
All that shows is what a sick f**k you are.
Just because I call you to account for your irrational and highly illogical predictions?
More baloney. Nehalem, per Intel, will feature a bigger jump in performance over Penryn than Core2 provided over Netburst.
Hummm. That is not really what I understood when I spoke with the chief Nehalem architect a few weeks ago, though I must admit he wasn't exactly laying it all out for me. It's largely the same three-issue core as far as I understand.
Given Core 2 Duo is a four issue core the odds are you don't understand very well.
LOL that's an understatement, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing ;-)
As your ludicrous AMD boosting over the paper launched Barcelona and future delayed and sure to be underwhelming AMD products, proves.
As for arguing with mas, it is a bad habit, I admit, but I like to get him on the record with as many outrageous predictions as possible, just for future amusement's sake.
LOL, like I said before the only one making amusing outrageous wrong predictions is you. Here's what you said about IPF in 2004 !
One other thing. Why is everybody arguing with this "Mas" lunatic? I think the debate would be more productive if we stick to reality and discuss what the absence of Bulldozer from the new roadmaps means.
It is just fun to watch this arch FUDSTER squirm as his inane and inept predictions come crumbling around him.
I suppose it is a bit like pulling the wings off a retarded fly. LOL!!!
All that shows is what a sick f**k you are.
Just because I call you to account for your irrational and highly illogical predictions?
Tsk, Tsk, eh I mean Tick, Tock. LOL!!!!
Err no, more what you do with flies although you obviously consider that normal behaviour.
More baloney. Nehalem, per Intel, will feature a bigger jump in performance over Penryn than Core2 provided over Netburst.
Hummm. That is not really what I understood when I spoke with the chief Nehalem architect a few weeks ago, though I must admit he wasn't exactly laying it all out for me. It's largely the same three-issue core as far as I understand.
Given Core 2 Duo is a four issue core the odds are you don't understand very well.
LOL that's an understatement, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing ;-)
As your ludicrous AMD boosting over the paper launched Barcelona and future delayed and sure to be underwhelming AMD products, proves.
You really are so dumb as to not be able to distinguish architectural comparisons with specific company cheering which is all your tiny mind is capable of, tick tock indeed !
As for arguing with mas, it is a bad habit, I admit, but I like to get him on the record with as many outrageous predictions as possible, just for future amusement's sake.
ROFL, you couldn't be more useless if you tried ;-).
mas, you've been wrong about almost everything for the past year and a half. C2D impact on marketshare, AMD's financial fortunes, AMD's 65nm timetable, AMD's 65nm K8 clockspeeds, Barcelona's timetable, Barcelona's launch frequencies, Barcelona's relative performance, and the list goes on...
Yet you proclaim "I was 100% correct" every time someone brings up any of these topics.
You're a clown. Just like Hector. And Mario. And Randy. And Bob. And Dirk.
You really are so dumb as to not be able to distinguish architectural comparisons with specific company cheering which is all your tiny mind is capable of, tick tock indeed !
Says the IT lackey for a Fashion company with a physics degree from a second-rate institution...
One other thing. Why is everybody arguing with this "Mas" lunatic? I think the debate would be more productive if we stick to reality and discuss what the absence of Bulldozer from the new roadmaps means.
It is just fun to watch this arch FUDSTER squirm as his inane and inept predictions come crumbling around him.
I suppose it is a bit like pulling the wings off a retarded fly. LOL!!!
All that shows is what a sick f**k you are.
Just because I call you to account for your irrational and highly illogical predictions?
Tsk, Tsk, eh I mean Tick, Tock. LOL!!!!
Err no, more what you do with flies although you obviously consider that normal behaviour.
I guess you are too stupid to understand the difference between literal and figurative.
Can't say I am too surprised considering the idiotic stance you not only adopted on Barcelona but continue to defend and promote.
More baloney. Nehalem, per Intel, will feature a bigger jump in performance over Penryn than Core2 provided over Netburst.
Hummm. That is not really what I understood when I spoke with the chief Nehalem architect a few weeks ago, though I must admit he wasn't exactly laying it all out for me. It's largely the same three-issue core as far as I understand.
Given Core 2 Duo is a four issue core the odds are you don't understand very well.
LOL that's an understatement, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing ;-)
As your ludicrous AMD boosting over the paper launched Barcelona and future delayed and sure to be underwhelming AMD products, proves.
You really are so dumb as to not be able to distinguish architectural comparisons with specific company cheering which is all your tiny mind is capable of, tick tock indeed !
What is truly stupid is your inability to grasp how Nehalem's architecture does more for Intel, than Shanghai does for AMD.
You better get some back up from your mentors at AMDZone.com or whatever sickening fanboy forum you "learnt" all your muddled understanding about computers from.
As for arguing with mas, it is a bad habit, I admit, but I like to get him on the record with as many outrageous predictions as possible, just for future amusement's sake.
ROFL, you couldn't be more useless if you tried ;-).
mas, you've been wrong about almost everything for the past year and a half. C2D impact on marketshare, AMD's financial fortunes, AMD's 65nm timetable, AMD's 65nm K8 clockspeeds, Barcelona's timetable, Barcelona's launch frequencies, Barcelona's relative performance, and the list goes on...
Yet you proclaim "I was 100% correct" every time someone brings up any of these topics.
You're a clown. Just like Hector. And Mario. And Randy. And Bob. And Dirk.
You're the only clown here and I have dug up all the posts to prove it and what fun it was LOL, I do so enjoy exposing you for the complete idiot and fool you continually are ;-)
Nehalem is going to have higher single threaded performance than Harpertown/Clovertown.
Nehalem is a 4 issue core, with a 3 level cache hierarchy.
DK
As long as it's not cache bound and thanks for confirming what I read elsewhere about the L3. As to the level of discussion blame dougy and ducky, the 2 jeering trolling factless fanbois who do insist on slagging me off on every thread they post on no matter how thinly related it is to the subject at hand lol ;-)
Last edited by mas on Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:53 am, edited 3 times in total.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
