Aceshardware

(not so) temporary home for the aceshardware community
 FAQ •  Search •  Register •  Login 
It is currently Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:53 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour



Welcome
Welcome to <strong>Aceshardware</strong>.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: AMD market share up close to 25% since last quarter
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 5:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 1:25 pm
Posts: 200
It looks like AMD's move to 45nm is really paying off.

I have to admit, I didn't expect the result of Nehalem's general availability to be a big increase for AMD market share...
Quote:
A recent Mercury Research report indicated that AMD's global CPU market share has risen from 17% in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 20.9% in the first quarter of 2009. The sources expect AMD's share will continue rising since AMD platforms allow consumers to change CPUs without replacing other components, greatly reducing costs.

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090506PD228.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AMD market share up close to 25% since last quarter
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:19 am
Posts: 331
Location: Milano, Italy
AtWork wrote:
It looks like AMD's move to 45nm is really paying off.

I have to admit, I didn't expect the result of Nehalem's general availability to be a big increase for AMD market share...

Their 45nm X3 and X4 offerings are very competitive though considering how they are priced I doubt they are making much money out of them. BTW they should really revamp their dual-cores, possibly with something which isn't a quad-core with two cores disabled. Personally I'd really like a K10-based X2 with either lower TDP compared to the X4 and/or higher clocks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AMD market share up close to 25% since last quarter
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:57 am
Posts: 190
Gabriele Svelto wrote:
AtWork wrote:
It looks like AMD's move to 45nm is really paying off.

I have to admit, I didn't expect the result of Nehalem's general availability to be a big increase for AMD market share...

Their 45nm X3 and X4 offerings are very competitive though considering how they are priced I doubt they are making much money out of them. BTW they should really revamp their dual-cores, possibly with something which isn't a quad-core with two cores disabled. Personally I'd really like a K10-based X2 with either lower TDP compared to the X4 and/or higher clocks.



The dual core Brisbanes for the desktop will be replaced by the quad core
Propus. It's reported to have a very small die size of 141mm2 versus the
Brisbane's 126mm2

The 45nm dual core mobile processor will launch in June/July with a 15W
version for the mobile congo platform. 100% of the waver starts is at
45nm now.

Regards, Hans


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 7:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:48 pm
Posts: 218
There is a bit more to the story here:

http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showAr ... =217201229

AMD gained nearly four percentage points of market share over archrival Intel Corp. in the quarter. However, "the quarter was defined by inventory adjustments, so the statistics do not necessarily reflect the actual state of the market or market share," he added.


Also I'm a bit puzzled by the last part of the Digitimes article:

The sources expect AMD's share will continue rising since AMD platforms allow consumers to change CPUs without replacing other components, greatly reducing costs

That really makes no sense - the number of CPUs replaced in existing systems must be insignificant for the overall mass market.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 11:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:53 am
Posts: 214
True, upgrades is such a small percentage of the market it has always been insignificant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 2:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:49 am
Posts: 134
martinw wrote:
Also I'm a bit puzzled by the last part of the Digitimes article:

The sources expect AMD's share will continue rising since AMD platforms allow consumers to change CPUs without replacing other components, greatly reducing costs

That really makes no sense - the number of CPUs replaced in existing systems must be insignificant for the overall mass market.

They probably just quoted AMD marketing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 5:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 11:06 am
Posts: 259
I would agree that this is all marketing, but if you look at Seagate's last Q results, they said it was due to unusually high sales of IDE drives. Basically, people are upgrading more than usual.

Will this carry over to CPUs? I don't know, but if it does, AMD is in a MUCH better place than Intel. I wouldn't think the numbers are that huge in either case, but for essentially no added cost to either chipmaker, there is no down side.

-Charlie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 1:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:01 am
Posts: 652
Groo wrote:
I would agree that this is all marketing, but if you look at Seagate's last Q results, they said it was due to unusually high sales of IDE drives. Basically, people are upgrading more than usual.

Will this carry over to CPUs? I don't know, but if it does, AMD is in a MUCH better place than Intel. I wouldn't think the numbers are that huge in either case, but for essentially no added cost to either chipmaker, there is no down side.

-Charlie


After the sells of the inventories at low prices, watch for the Market shares ...

Oh... by the way, I though it was impossible to gain market share ... ;-)

personal opinion, as usual, I am not an insider on MSR, so, i am free to speak.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Can mortals buy 2387s?
PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 11:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:17 am
Posts: 65
I've been wanting to upgrade the dual dual-core machine at work for a little while, but it doesn't seem straightforward to find an Opteron 2387 for sale in Britain; google shopper only has Official HP Upgrades at £800 per CPU, and our machine isn't from HP ...

Given that what we do would work pretty much as well on separate quad-core boxes, and that £1600 buys three quad-core machines with 8GB each, I continue somewhat reluctant to do the upgrade.

(are there consumer motherboards which take a Shanghai and four 4GB DDR2 modules? 2GB per core starts feeling a bit small as the Fourier transforms get larger; the Socket-F motherboard we have doesn't suppose 4G DDR2)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AMD market share up close to 25% since last quarter
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:55 pm
Posts: 829
Location: Great white north
AtWork wrote:
It looks like AMD's move to 45nm is really paying off.



Indeed, AMD today reported its 11th straight money losing quarter.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/AMD-Repor ... l?x=0&.v=1

AMD hasn't had a profitable quarter since Q3 2006.
For the historically challenged I'll recap:

Q3 2006 : +$134m
Q4 2006 : -$576m

Q1 2007 : -$611m
Q2 2007 : -$600m
Q3 2007 : -$396m
Q4 2007 : -$1772m

Q1 2008 : -$358m
Q2 2008 : -$1189m
Q3 2008 : -$67m
Q4 2008 : -$1274m

Q1 2009 : -$308m
Q2 2009 : -$249m

Over this period AMD has lost a total of $7.4B and its net worth to
shareholders has fallen to -$465m.

AMD said in Q2 its gross margin was 27%, down from 35% in Q1.
In contrast Intel's GM in Q2 was 50.8%, up from 46% in Q1.

Right again AtWork, 45 nm is sure paying off for AMD. :-P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:10 pm
Posts: 224
So, antecipating IDC reporst about market share, AMD loose on servers, gained on graphics and flat on others.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:38 pm
Posts: 479
AMD Q2 results: Microprocessor Units: flat vs. Q1
Intel Q2 results: Microprocessor units were higher versus the first quarter.

Therefore it is reasonable to expect that AMD has lost some CPU marketshare in Q2. Server sales and ASPs probably decreased a lot, and this has resulted in a very low gross margin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: AMD market share up close to 25% since last quarter
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:44 pm
Posts: 267
Location: Belgium
AtWork wrote:
It looks like AMD's move to 45nm is really paying off.

I have to admit, I didn't expect the result of Nehalem's general availability to be a big increase for AMD market share...
Quote:
A recent Mercury Research report indicated that AMD's global CPU market share has risen from 17% in the fourth quarter of 2008 to 20.9% in the first quarter of 2009. The sources expect AMD's share will continue rising since AMD platforms allow consumers to change CPUs without replacing other components, greatly reducing costs.

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090506PD228.html


I would like to see some numbers on the Core I7 sales... it is probably a pretty small market. However, when CoreI5 arrives, I fear AMD will be in a lot of trouble in the desktop market.

On the other hand, AMD has been executing well the past months in the server space with now Istanbul HE and SE parts available. Although I don't get who will be buying those 105-137W SE parts when 95W TDP Nehalems outperform them. The dual socket market is going to be interesting, with Intel's low power Nehalems out which target the HE.

Their EE parts will surely get them some larger deals with the "Hyperscale customers".

With 75-105W Istanbul parts at 2.6 GHz, AMD is also king again in the Quad socket market, which should drive up their ASP mildly next q.

So Q3 should be decent for AMD, but I fear Q4 will be pretty though with Core i3-i5


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:34 am
Posts: 107
IIRC I saw a post but can't remember the Q, Q1 '09 or Q4 '08 which stated ~55 million units (Intel), 1 million Nehalem, half of which were Xeon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:55 pm
Posts: 829
Location: Great white north
Interestingly AMD is still shipping a huge amount of its miserable 65 nm
devices. It won't even cross over 50% 45 nm until later this quarter.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/150310- ... ipt?page=3

Robert J. Rivet

No. We will still be shipping 65 nanometer in Q3. I would expect we will cross over to be dominated by 45 nanometer in Q4. The crossover takes place in Q3. But a significant portion of the shipments in Q3 will be 45 nanometer. Probably not 60%, but more in the 40% to 50% kind of zone, so a significant piece versus it was immaterial in the second quarter.


If they work hard maybe AMD will get its 65 nm portion down to 10%
by Q4. The problem is Intel said it hopes to be shipping 10% 32 nm
devices in Q4. Until then Intel appears to be content to drop prices
on mid range 45 nm C2D parts to keep pressure on AMD's top of the
line client processors while it rakes in the dough from i7 and Atom
unchallenged. Once the Beckton starts shipping AMD will face a very
bleak competitive situation across its entire MPU product line in every
segment.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: