You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!
Post subject: Carbon Dioxide irrelevant in climate debate - MIT Scientist
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:40 pm
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:52 pm Posts: 327
"In a study sure to ruffle the feathers of the Global Warming cabal, Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT has published a paper which proves that IPCC models are overstating by 6 times, the relevance of CO2 in Earth’s Atmosphere. Dr. Lindzen has found that heat is radiated out in to space at a far higher rate than any modeling system to date can account for."
As predicted by The Paranoid Corollary.
"There are only a couple of conclusions to be made of this. Either the world has been misled by scientists working for the UN and IPCC due to faulty science, or faulty science has been deliberately used in a global scheme to generate tax revenues for the Governments instituting Cap and Trade Taxation policies."
"Either way, the world has been the victim of some very bad science. The results of which can be seen in drastically reduced GDP in countries with the Cap and Trade laws in place, as well a a 5 - 10% decrease in standard of living for those citizens living there (Taxing Carbon designed to fail.), all with little or no effect on emissions globally."
As I have always said, all you need to do is follow the money. Global warming a basically just tax revenue scam. So called "scientists" feeding off government grants to create junk science in an attempt to support bureaucratic cap and trade tax schemes. Amazing how many naive people have bought into this hoax.
Post subject: Re: Carbon Dioxide irrelevant in climate debate - MIT Scientist
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:16 pm
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:35 am Posts: 42
Quote:
Climategate: E-mail Scandal Could Melt Copenhagen Plans
As was reported here previously, the release of thousands of e-mails and documents from a climate research center threatens to expose some of the biggest scientific names in the global warming debate to serious charges of fraud, unethical attacks on colleagues, censorship of opposing viewpoints, and possible criminal destruction and withholding of evidence.
Michael Mann, James Hansen, Phil Jones, Michael Oppenheimer, Stephen Schneider, Kevin Trenberth — these are but a few of the "big guns" of global warming alarmism who are unfavorably exposed in the documents that were posted on the Internet by unknown hackers who penetrated the computer system of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at Britain's University of East Anglia.
Post subject: Re: Carbon Dioxide irrelevant in climate debate - MIT Scientist
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:05 pm
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:55 pm Posts: 720
up wrote:
Quote:
Climategate: E-mail Scandal Could Melt Copenhagen Plans
As was reported here previously, the release of thousands of e-mails and documents from a climate research center threatens to expose some of the biggest scientific names in the global warming debate to serious charges of fraud, unethical attacks on colleagues, censorship of opposing viewpoints, and possible criminal destruction and withholding of evidence.
Michael Mann, James Hansen, Phil Jones, Michael Oppenheimer, Stephen Schneider, Kevin Trenberth — these are but a few of the "big guns" of global warming alarmism who are unfavorably exposed in the documents that were posted on the Internet by unknown hackers who penetrated the computer system of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at Britain's University of East Anglia.
It is shocking isnt it ? Must be for the nay sayers. 10 or 15 years of private correspondence is stolen and there is no shred of evidence of some grand conspiracy, no bribes, no mention of it being a hoax, no tampering with data. All you see is a few gross out of context quotes, most of which are thoroughly debunked or given their appropriate context here: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar ... -cru-hack/ and http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar ... k-context/
If this is indeed a smoking gun, then it is one that proves there is no wordwide conspiracy to fake science to increase taxes or whatever, and one that shows how low the nay sayers will stoop to convince you otherwise. How would you feel if your private emails for the last 15 years where selectively published on the web in an attempt to discredit you?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
