You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:04 pm Posts: 126 Location: Tampere, Finland
I thought FMAC was not possible on x86?
MAC does not fit into the default instruction format, where each instruction has only 2 operands (destination = op(destination, source)) but by making the instruction decoder more complex then can use other instruction format also. They introduced some new prefix byte for this.
i was talking more about SIMD-like instructions. my understanding of AMD64 (or whatever you want to call it) adds new registers, extends existing onesc, and creation of a prefix to access the extended registers. i'd call that different from adding SIMD capablities to x86. maybe i just worded my statement wrong.
Anandtech says that AMD will not support SSE4 until 2010 at earliest: "Finally, we've been told that full SSE4 support is coming for AMD's chips, but without a date. We know that it won't be in Bulldozer, which means SSE4 support won't be happening until a Bulldozer refresh, which will be no earlier than 2010."
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum